Was the MA Brown/Coakley Election Rigged?

As an expert on statistical analysis (four semesters in college plus several semesters of Boolean logic/algebra) I have studied many a spreadsheet about things like cancer research, environmental concerns and elections. There is little doubt that other than Obama's win for the presidency in 2008, every election has shown signs of tampering. The only thing that is clear is that you can't fix a landslide, at least not yet. When the country goes totally paperless in their voting booths though that may change. One of the best in studying this fact has been researcher Johnathan Simon, an expert on statistics and a leading front on the stolen elections we have been having since 2000. Now he's shed some light on the recent election in MA between Coakley and Brown. His findings? Coakley should have won. While the actual election results shave been sealed, the only reason being the state doesn't want this fraud found out, he has uncovered a statistical anomaly that cannot be explained. In every place where electronic voting machines weren't being used, Coakley won. In the other 97% Brown won a statistical majority. Why? Innocent explanations must be eliminated first. Were the three percent in Democrat majority areas, where Coakley was expected to win? No, the three percent actually tracked higher Republican voters than Democrats. Statistical fluke? No, chances are one in a million. As a matter of fact, when this occurrence happens in other states, the hand count mirrors the electronic votes. Except here and during the Presidential elections of 2000 and 2004. As EG&G and Diebold are both responisible for the voting equipment we use and Republican contributors, one has to question how accurate these things really are.
Worse, Democrats seem to be compliant in their own defeat. Coakley resigned with a quarter of the votes still being counted. Gore and, especially, Kerry gave up without too much of a fight. True Gore took it to the Supreme Court, where our President was appointed not voted in, but he still has ammo including the fact the Dick Cheney was not eligible for VP as he and Bush resided in the same state, a no no according to our Constitution. Cheney got away with that by moving to Wyoming but residency laws showed he was still officially a Texan. Did Gore try to use this info? No he did not. He slinked away like a beaten dog. And Kerry threw in the towel before the blood had even dried on the floor. One thing Kerry and Coakley both had were horribly run campaigns and I still wonder if these two may have just taken a dive for some nefarious reason. In CT, there was a deal between Republicans and Democrats that the the Republicans wouldn't run anybody good versus Dodd or Lieberman and the Democrats wouldn't run anybody good for Governor. Having watched and talked with insiders during Barbra Kennelly's horrific run for Governor I can vouch this as true. All this leaves the question, who's in charge? And why should we vote if it doesn't matter? One article I read today, advocated getting your guns, going down to the police station and shooting every cop there. I think this is a bad idea mind you but shows the mind set of an increasingly angry public. If our votes don't matter how long before this becomes a reality?