Bin Laden Death: What Does It Mean?

Conspiracy theories aside, no one disagrees that Osama Bin Laden is officially dead. When he died and what was his involvement in 9/11 is another story. My studies have shown numerous errors in the official story of the day of tragedy that are facts that cannot by disputed such as

*The FBI was not seeking Bin Laden for 9/11 as they said "they did not have enough information to charge him with the crime."

*Why did Dick Cheney give a stand down order as planes approached Washington? (Congressional record of testimony by then Secretary of Treasury Norman Mineta)

*Why did planes taking off from Otis Air Force Base travel at half the speed of a 747 to get to the equivalent of a five alarm fire? (Simple math. Look at the time it took them to get from point a to point b and compare that to official records of a time line. The planes were traveling around 250 miles per hour. Why?)

*Why did the military lie to the 9/11 commission about the timeline of events that day? (Chairmen Dean and Hamiliton sent the issue to the Pentagon Accounting Office for disciplinary action of which none was taken.)

*How did the BBC know building 7 was going to fall a half hour before it did? (News footage shows a reporter talking about building 7 being gone even though it was in the background for all to see. Oddly, the BBC claims all footage of this was accidentally erased. On the Internet however it lives on.)

*Why have most of the tapes given out by Osama over the last seven years been obvious fakes? (Only The US proclaimed them real, while every one else, including top experts on Bin Laden, said they were forgeries. If he ws living the high life in Pakistan couldn't he have gotten some video equipment as well instead of audio tapes?)

*Why hasn't Al Queda or Bin Laden done ANYTHING for the past ten years? And subsequently, why have all the so called terrorists since 9/11 (and maybe London on 7/7 to a lesser extent) been as reliable as a drunken monkey?

These are just a few of the questions that need to still be answered. Everything up there happened as reported and if you don't believe me, by all means look it up. You shouldn't trust what anyone writes about unless you can verify it anyway.

So what does it all up to? I don't know. Bin Laden cannot have been dead, like I would have put money on, for the past 9 years. Some bloggers have said they've created a dead bogeyman to scare the masses and have "killed" him off to start some sort of WW3 scenario. Possible, but unlikely. If this is true then cooperation exist between the two major US parties that seems to stretch creditability. It would mean that they are both conspiring together to bring down the US and the whole left/right thing is an act. I don't buy it. Yes, corporate fascism runs our lives but even I don't think that it's that stable a system.

So if that's true, then in no way does Obama "find" Bin Laden. Republicans would have dusted this old chestnut off to help get McCain put in office. So as Bush wouldn't be helping Obama, that means Osama has been alive this whole time. This leaves only a few possibilities:

*He's been working for the CIA this whole time, his usefulness outlives, they sacrifice him to Obama for yet unknown reasons.

*We really are that awesome and have crippled his network and forced him to live in hiding for the past nine years.

*Al Queda is a myth, Bin Laden is a bogeyman and we've hunted him down for show only.

One of those theories is right. The CIA one I still feel to be the least likely. The second and third on the other hand are still up for debate. What isn't is that Bin Laden is dead.