The first accuser, Leeann Tweeden, has had her story ripped apart into a million pieces. Video of the event shows her grabbing men's asses, without permission I might add, and even kissing soldiers against their will. Why is that NOT an issue? Plus, the sketch she says was "pervy," was the same sketch he had done for years in which the pretty model pretends to be grossed out by Franken kissing her and then she kisses a soldier instead. As this was done with other women before her, why don't they have the same story? Because it never happened. Her credibility should have been in question as she works for fucking FOX NEWS and is a regular guest on Hannity. I will also add the USO escort, who is supposed to be glued to the hip to their targets, said he saw nothing that she is describing. This is a hit job.
The second accuser, some fucked up idiot who is an editor for a way far right website, said Franken harassed her on the set of the Politically Incorrect. She alleged he called her at all hours threatening her. Even the media didn't buy this story and as there was no sexual aspect to it, was ignored by all but people like Breitbart. Her story is an almost certain lie.
Now comes the new story by some bitch out of Minnesota. Allegedly, while taking a picture together at the state fair, he grabbed her ass. Right. The photo in question shows her with a huge smile on her face and he looks bored. Here's the part I don't get: why didn't she say anything right there and then? I understand when the person is your boss or in a position of power that was real consequences to your life. A US Senator has some power but not enough to mess up your life. So why not say something right there and then like "What the fuck? You just grabbed my ass!" Then the husband would have been involved and the whole thing would have been front and center. I've had my ass grabbed and let me tell you I didn't wait seven years to voice my protest. I punched the guy as hard as I could. This whole "I am going to wait years to voice my complaint" is bullshit in some instances. I understand why people waited years to tell about Roy Moore or Harvey Weinstein. But someone who has no pull on your life shouldn't be waiting decades to tell their tale with any amount of believability.
This looks like a lie. I want to see this woman's bank records. Something tells me there will be a huge deposit in there from someone in the RNC. At this point, these woman have the same credibility as Clinton's three accusers, none of which all believable. Supposedly, four more women are coming forward to accuse the former president but even if they do, because of what Franken is going through, I don't know if I will believe them and there in lies the problem.
As I told you yesterday, this is going to make rape cases even HARDER to prosecute, especially of the person is famous. There will always be the stain of political expedience in any of them and, as the Franken accusers appear to be lying, EVERY accusation after this, regardless of party, has to be taken with a grain of salt, short of overwhelming evidence, which almost certainly does not exist. This shouldn't have been a political thing but thanks to the spinelessness of the Democrats, who cannot stop running from a fight, and the Republicans, who can politicize a ham sandwich, sexual assault claims are now going to be seen as bunk regardless of truth, God help us all.
No comments:
Post a Comment